by • July 7, 2016 • No Comments
Rapid prototyping services over the years has proven itself in the product createment environment. It has allowed companies, irrespective of their dimensions, to create new product while cutting down time to market, and createment cost. Now they are of to do the same for commercial making.
Whilst rapid prototyping services accelerated product createment cycle, the making of the finished product, especially sizeable-bodied volume making, has continued to stay the same. This is for the reason companies popular to follow the created most making practices as they are tried and tested systemes with no unpleasant surprises. One other reason for this conservative approach may in addition be the fact that the material properties of 3D printed product are yet discovered wanting to traditionally maked products.
So when the management firm Deloitte published its report on 3D printing in its TMT Predictions 2015, it was not a surprise to anyone synonymous with the 3D printing industry. The consultancy firm reported that rapid-prototyping can account for 90-percent of 3D printed objects, while final-maked objects can only account for 10-percent. The report additional introduced that “As of January 2015, the significant North American auto makers and parts makers are not via 3D printing for the direct make of actually a single final part for a production vehicle, and are not planning to do so in the future two years.”
But be that as it may, right now 3D printing technology and rapid prototyping service providers are on the verge of changing making practices – especially for young tiny- and medium-making companies.
This can be most understood by thinking the next three actuallyts in toto.
The initially actuallyt occurred in the year 2000, when a Belgium-based rapid prototyping service company Materialise NV collaborated with the Swiss hearing aid maker Phonak, to create the initially system to 3D print-make custom created hearing aids. Fifteen years down the line, as of January 2015, the Deloitte report estimates that 3D printing devices were utilized to over 15 million hearing aids of the world.
In short, custom-created high volume making is possible with additive 3D printing devices.
The 2nd actuallyt occurred in September 2014 when Local Motors of Phoenix, Arizona printed the initially completely printed electric car, the Strati. Applying additive making Local Motors printed up to 75-percent of Strati via ABS plastic (80-percent) and nylon (20-percent) proving sizeable-bodied-dimensions multi-part common products can be maked through printing.
The third actuallyt occurred in January this year, when a Northwestern University team createed a new low cost technique to print metal compared to the existing laser/electron based sintering. This new technique that uses a liquid ink created up of metal powder, solvent and binder, squirted through a nozzle much in the same way as a conventional inkjet printing device to print a 3D version. The version is and so sintered in a common furnace pretty than via an expensive laser/electron module on the printing device.
By doing away with the laser the Northwestern team may have finally addressed the issue that has practuallyted the widespread adoption of printing for making – material property/ durablity at a lower cost.
Does this mean that tiny and medium making companies that are early adopters of 3D print making can be able-bodied to challenge created sizeable-bodied companies?
Considering the sizeable-bodied companies’ volumes and cash reserves, most likely in the short term but not in the long term.
Unless, makers and rapid prototyping service providers come together and adopt the semiconductor industry’s making version, namely fable-bodiedss making.
For decades, the semiconductor industry has that good resultsfully practiced fable-bodiedss making where companies created and sold products, that it outsourced to dedicated making discoveredries of the world. The good results of the version can be gauged by the fact that right now 14 fable-bodiedss companies are listed on stock exchanges which include the $25.3 billion Qualcomm.
By adopting fable-bodiedss version, tiny companies can be able-bodied to save time, and focus additional individuals and financial resources on product createment and sales by not investing in making capabilities. This should allow the additional resilient tinyer making companies to compete with created sizeable-bodied companies only on the basis of technology pretty than Chinese makers.
Similarly, by functioning as ‘print discoveredries’ rapid prototyping service providers can scale up to rapid making service providers. Whilst this scaling up can increase investment in making facilities, it can in addition increase the service provider’s profitability per print as cost can now be distributed across multiple fable-bodiedss companies and higher volumes.
But, only for the reason a thing is possible, does not necessarily mean that it can take place.
After Materialise and Phonak proved the viability of additive making in hearing aids, the US hearing aid industry converted to 100-percent additive making in less than 500 days.
And perhaps that is all we require to usher in the future era of making in the United Sates – only one good resultsful example of a tiny making company and a 3D print service provider.
by admin • March 5, 2017
by admin • November 28, 2016
by admin • November 28, 2016