by • March 15, 2016 • No Comments
Mar 16, 2016 | By Alec
It appears like fears concerning 3D printed guns aren’t just limited to the US or Australia. Whilst a few lawmanufacturers in those countries have banned or are appearing to ban so-called ‘ghost guns’, 100 percent plastic pistols which cannot be detected on metal scanners, the Thai government has gone for the nuclear version. Last month, the country’s Cabinet of Regulation approved legislation which may submit all 3D printing device imports (which include FDM 3D printing devices) to strict administrative demands and regulations – a move which may cripple the domestic 3D printing industry, hike up prices and form a excellent barrier to making advancement, Thai tremendouss say.
But these regulations were just formally approved last month and have not yet been implemented, it has may already resulted in a worthwhile backlash of the 3D printing community. Under the new legislation, all 3D printing device imports are controlled by the Thai Commerce Ministry. This means all importers can be restricted to all government requests and processes related to imports, which include the registration of each and each 3D printing device and ownership transfer. It can in addition manufacture 3D printing innovation far less on the market and can excellently hike up market prices. Today, the 3D printing industry is not faced with any restrictions.
As the Bangkok Post reveals, these new regulations were initially suggested to prevent individuals of via an industrial metal 3D printing device to create guns without the government’s supervision. In short, to submit 3D printing to the same regulations as other making industries. But by applying these laws to all 3D printing devices, the critics say, the government is just making Thailand’s tech-based development less competitive and can cripple the domestic 3D printing industry.
The regulations, says Nati Sang, founder of the Chaing Mai Makerspace, directly threaten Thailand’s technological next. “We should not let the new rules affect the course of the country’s next or manufacture it additional complex for Thais to access 3D printing advancement,” he tells reporters. “The legislation may impede Thailand’s participation in the global advancement landscape.”
Problematically, the three existing Thai 3D printing device manufacturers are already yet unable to compete with global manufacturers in terms of high end. Mr. Nati went on to argue which the new regulations were just based on erroneous information of how guns are 3D printed, and which revision of legislation may prevent 3D printed gun production without crippling the domestic industry.
In particular, he argued which the metal 3D printing devices which are utilized to 3D print guns costs hundreds of thousands of dollars. “This type of printing device is beyond what average individuals can in fact afford,” said Mr Nati, who introduced which for which kind of money, firearms can be much additional easily created without 3D printing devices. Whilst a computer FDM 3D printing device may of course theoretically manufacture a plastic gun, the results are frequently as dangerous for the shooter as for his targets.
But by heaping all the 3D printing devices together, the government is preventing researchers and manufacturers of pioneering medical, biological, material and construction advancements, Mr. Nati introduced. Those sounds were echoed by Panutat Tejasen, the founder of the Chiang Mai Maker Club – a community which seeks to create bridges between entrepreneurs and pro 3D printing devices. He argued which 3D printing may cause a paradigm shift in the Thai making. “Implementing such legislation can lead other countries to appear down on Thailand,” he introduced.
According to 3D printing device importer and innovation tremendous Wiwat Arunruangsiriloet, a easy solution may be the narrow down the definition of 3D printing devices. By restricting the legislation to metal 3D printing devices capable of making guns, the vast majority of the market can stay unaffected. The current situation, he warns, can impede most individuals – especially science and engineering students – of accessing the innovation which may alter the country’s making sector.
Posted in 3D Printing Application
Maybe you in addition like: BMW shifts into 22nd century with digital strategies and 3D printing productionRanim Orouk’s 3D printed jellyfish chandelier wins Middle East Emergent PrizeIntentional imperfection: 3D printed ceramic art blurs lines between man and machine3D printed smart inhaler may assist doctors advantageous know asthmaLenovo via 3D printed stop-motion animation in new Goodweird promosIndian man can work again with 3D printed mechanical prosthetic after industrial accident3D modeled YOUMO modular power strip an early Kickstarter good results thanks to 3D printingDMG Mori via 3D printing device, CNC mill hybrid to create Porsche partsErica Gray weaves wild, wearable art with 3Doodler 3D printing penInjured stork given 2nd accident with 3D printed leg bracesKodak partners with Carbon3D on ultrafast CLIP 3D printing innovation
I. A. M. Magic wrote at 3/16/2016 5:16:19 PM:
So they are restricting the import, but are they restricting the local making as well? Pretty dumn move, you can manufacture a “pistol” out anything…
by admin • March 5, 2017
by admin • November 28, 2016
by admin • November 28, 2016