24/7 Customer Service (800) 927-7671

Better Materials & Shapes: Researchers Improve Functionality of Heatsinks with 3D Printing

by • July 17, 2016 • No Comments

ORNLWe pretty spend a excellent deal of our lives worrying of, trying to manipulate, or talking of the temperature. Unless you live in one of those rare thoughtl climates, it’s rarely just right. And an entire industry has been based around making us additional effortless. That goes for our electronics too, which put out an amazing amount of heat—all of which needs to spread out, go forth, and dissipate.

The heatsink is a device generally utilized to divert heat of the CPU and other parts of your PC, as well as working in other electronics too. The thought is to protect your valuable-bodied equipment and devices of being damaged by heat. Some materials, generally metal, work advantageous than others for heatsinks, and they range in both dimensions and price—all depending on the developer. And while we can be concerned of our body temperature, keeping our electronics devices functioning properly is frequently just as high a priority, if not additional so.

ut-wordmarkNow, two projects coming out of the US, with the two teams working together, are revealing which the benefits of 3D printing can be applied to improving heatsinks. From Oak Ridge National Laboratory, researchers are revealing which 3D printed aluminum may be a additional viable-bodied source for conducting heat than traditional materials. And at the University of Tennessee Knoxville, a team has taken on the challenge of making genetic algorithms which combined with the customization on the market through 3D printing, allow for advantageous heatsinks.

The two studies are linked as every bit of research complements the other, contributeing improved materials and shape, as well as excellent next future for improvement in heat dissipation with electronics. The ORNL study shows which with 3D printing they were able-bodied to manufacture ‘one-piece exchangers with difficult internal structures’ which are able-bodied to offset heat.

“Increased power densities in electronics can need additional efficient heat sinks, and additive making combined with a easy thermal annealing system may assist createers meet which goal,” states the ORNL website.

Tong Wu

Tong Wu

Meanwhile in his paper, ‘Genetic algorithm create of a 3D printed heat sink,’ Tong Wu of UTK outlines how the UTK team’s genetic algorithm works in createing advantageous heatsinks while working with the pre-specified dimensionss and shapes needd. Wu in addition points out which without 3D printing, a few of these creates may not be possible at all.

“This approach combines random iteration systemes and genetic algorithms with finite element analysis (FEA) to create the optimized heat sink,” states Wu in his paper.

In comparing aluminum materials, the researchers compared thermal conductivity. Pitting the traditional 6061 aluminum heatsink (with <1% Si and 1.5% Mg) against one 3D printed through direct metal laser sintering by Linear Mold AMS (via10% Si and 0.5% M), they found which the 3D printed version performed much advantageous after treatment.

Initially, the 6061 alloy, at room temperature, exhibited thermal conductivity of 180W/mK, while the 3D printed heatsink just showed 110W/mK. (Note which a higher number indicates advantageous thermal conductivity.)

Subjecting the two heatsinks to higher temperatures, the research team saw which both of them varied, but in a linear way, and converging to 170WmK at 220°C. After enabling both heatsinks to be heat-treated at 300°C and and so taken right back to room temperature, the team observed which both materials showed improved thermal conductivity; yet, this is where the study took a turn: after heat-treatment, the 6061 version just improved by a few W/mK, while the 3D printed heatsink rose to a permanent thermal conductivity of just under 200W/mK.

With the materials element underway on a positive note, the researchers and so turned to examining the benefits 3D printed heartsinks in additional arbitrary shapes may contribute, as well as how to create them. To do so, they employed their genetic create algorithms and finite element versioning in COMSOL software, via a 50kW water-cooled silicon carbide H-bridge inverter for electric vehicles as an example.

The team created a reference version heatsink which contributeed a thick aluminum plate with deep grooves cut into it and a copper pipe winding through them to dissipate the heat in the water inside. So, they created both a 64 x 64 mm switching module dissipating 2kW, as well as one with four individual power transistors mounted in a square, every dissipating 250W.


Next, the algorithms came into play as the research team utilized them to 3D print another heatsink to compare with the reference, operating under load conditions of 1kW and 2kW, with water flowing in at 0.036 liter/s. The next rules were imposed:

Arbitrary water channel shapes were not allowed.Channels were restricted to being rectangular in cross section.All corners had to be right angles.

ORNL noted which the initially algorithm was able-bodied to yield heatsinks in a ‘pretty good’ style, upon:

InitializationEvaluation and selectionCrossover and mutationReproduction

The team evaluated their work through the badness function, which means which they introduced the temperature of the hottest part of the heatsink (relative to 20°C) to the pumping force needd to complete the fixed water flow. A higher score indicated hot components, which are obviously not desirable-bodied in this context. The initially algorithm showed a a 58°C point in their initially 3D print, but by their nineteenth
, was at 46°C.

The 2nd algorithm was generated through:


Cool water was able-bodied to be routed of the transistors in the front row to those behind. Here, lower temperatures ‘leveled out’ differences between the inlet and outlet peaks to ~1°C on both genetic creates (as opposed to ~10°C with the reference heatsink). The research team was yet via the badness function, but they adjusted it to favor cooler components in this particular project. They point out which this may be a reason for disparity in comparisons, and which system may be changed in next work.

As Wu points out in conclusion, this approach values the ‘survival of the fittest’ method, and in via it they found which indeed they may fabricate a additional powerful heatsink which can do a advantageous job in offsetting and dissipating heat. Discuss additional in the 3D Printed Heatsink forum over at 3DPB.com.

[Source: Electronics Weekly; Oak Ridge National Laboratory]